Before attacking the palace proper, I decided to take a stroll through the massive palatial gardens. It is here that the monarchs enjoyed many fountains, statues, hedge mazes, personal hunting grounds, and an in built canal in the form of a giant cross. To get an idea of just how gigantic this estate is, here is a video from the top of the steps looking out into the garden:
The one thing I really liked walking down the corridors into the grounds was the well kept lawn. This was a lawn that would make Hank Hill proud. I wonder how it was so well kept before the advances of modern landscaping, but I imagine it must have required an army of peasant gardeners. As I wandered down farther, I discovered the personal summer house of Marie Antoinette. What I liked especially about this place was that it had its own personal old style billiards room. Here are a couple pics:


As I was walking around Marie’s house, Mike and I were having a discussion about this large estate. I wondered why, after the revolution, the palace was not burned to the ground and the land given to farmers. And from there we drifted into the differences in land usage in the US and Europe, particularly in the growing up vs. growing out mentality. We agreed that Europe had no concept of either. In any major European city, most neighborhood buildings do not exceed 4 stories, perhaps maybe 5 or 6 max. At the same time, the cities are restricted in their ability to incorporate land outside of the city perimeter, making it hard to construct new housing developments and the like. In the US, by contrast, those areas with land do grow out, like the Phoenix or Chicago metropolitan areas, whereas cities with no more room to build like New York City or Los Angeles build high rises to sustain larger urban populations. While Europe is smaller than the continental US, it still has an abundance of land, land which Europeans seem hell-bent on not using. This led us to another conclusion for why European views towards immigration were so negative. Not only did they feel the watering down of their culture, but they feel a sense of overcrowding in their already overcrowded cities. The solutions seemed simple for us: for those cities than can build out, build out, and for those which cannot build out, build up. While we were discussing these matters, a pair of Brits who were trailing decided to pipe in, stating “Sounds like you two should book a pair of tickets home.” Leave it to the Brits to offer up some snide comment like that. Mike and I then got into a little discussion with the Brits over who were better conservationists: Americans or Europeans. They argued that they were better conservationists because they chose to preserve nature as well as constrain their urban development. We argued that we were better because we had already preserved very, very large acres of land as well as found ways around the problems associated with urban growth. By the end, it seemed to me that Europeans were trying to have their cake and eat it too when it came to conservationism and maintaining economic momentum through population growth. I found this ironic as Americans are always viewed as having our cake and eating it too, but honestly, I think we can because we think outside of the box and find ways around our problems without losing our commitment to nature. More power to us, I say.
Anyway, Mike and I made our way over to the canal to find our way back up to the palace (we had gotten a little lost, but once we found the water we were back on track). Here’s a pic of me in front of the large canal, which now hosts a paddle boat service:

The palace itself was impressive. Many large rooms with high-vaulted ceilings and art decos all over the walls and ceilings. The most impressive one I saw was the famous Washing of the Feet. Here it is:

Here is the Royal bedchamber where the monarchs got jiggy with it, a cool green marble wash basin, and of course, a picture of the queen herself:



The best part of it all, by far, was the famous Hall of Mirrors. It was here that the Treaty of Versailles was signed to “conclude” the First World War.* The hall was jam-packed with tourist groups, but I was able to get off some good shots of the beautiful chandeliers and the reflective walls. It was very interesting listening to tour guides give their spiel about the importance of the hall, especially when it came to the infamous Treaty of Versailles. It is amazing, as a historian, to hear how whitewashed that story has become. I was tempted to jump in and offer a few clarifications (yes, Germany was given a piece of paper to sign with little negotiation involved, no the Americans did not sign the treaty, etc) but why bother tourists on vacation with the truth. Here are a couple of pics:

In conclusion, the palace is a throwback to the opulence and sheer decadence of monarchical Europe. It was here that a few lucky individuals, born into a family of established, titled aristocrats lived a completely sheltered life from the millions of subjects which groveled and toiled beneath them. While I could admire the art, the architecture, and overall layout of the palace and gardens, I was sickened by the reason why it was established in the first place and for the people who once lived here. I suppose the only saving grace of justice came when the monarchs’ heads rolled. Karma’s a bitch, ain’t it?
* I use the word “conclude” loosely. The dictations of that treaty were a slap in the face to Germany, and became the root cause for the rise of fascism there fifteen years after its ratification. Also, it was a slap in the face to the Chinese, who had wanted the German sphere of influence in China restored to the republic. Instead, it was awarded to the Japanese for their participation with the Allies, giving them a perfect staging ground from which to invade the rest of China in the mid-1930s. What I’m saying here is that the Treaty laid the groundwork for WWII, and perhaps can be seen more as a twenty year truce than something to establish a meaningful, lasting peace; it is probably the worst document penned in the 20th century.

















































